Have you ever wondered how companies can mishandle a cyberattack so dramatically that they turn a manageable situation into a significant crisis?
In today’s digital landscape, cyberattacks have become a common occurrence, with one happening every 11 seconds. The reality is that your organization could be next. The statistics from 2024 alone indicate a staggering 3,200 reported data breaches in the U.S., putting the information of over 353 million people at risk. Understanding how to respond to a cyberattack is more critical than ever.
Communicating effectively during a cybersecurity incident can be just as vital as the incident response itself. Poor communication can lead to a loss of trust, making the consequences of the breach even worse than the attack itself. In this article, you will discover some of the worst crisis communication failures related to cyberattacks and the lessons that can be learned to ensure you are prepared when a crisis strikes.
This image is property of image-optimizer.cyberriskalliance.com.
Downplaying the Impact
A Case Study: Uber
One of the most notorious examples of downplaying the impact of a cyberattack comes from Uber. In June 2016, Uber failed to report a major data breach that exposed the personal data of 57 million users. Instead of notifying the public as required by law, Uber opted to pay the hackers $100,000 to keep the breach under wraps. When it eventually came to light in 2017, the situation transformed into a public relations nightmare.
This incident underscores a crucial lesson: downplaying the significance of a breach, especially when personal or sensitive data is involved, can backfire spectacularly. Audiences value honesty and transparency over corporate jargon. If you attempt to minimize the impact of an incident, it could lead to negative coverage that punctures your credibility and exposes you to potential legal ramifications.
Playing the Blame Game
A Case Study: Target
The infamous Target data breach of 2013 is another example of miscommunication during a cyber crisis. In this incident, 40 million credit and debit card details were stolen from customers. The initial response from Target placed a significant amount of blame on a third-party vendor, which may have introduced the vulnerability. While this was true, the public’s perception was that Target, as a trusted brand, should take accountability rather than deflect criticism.
This incident teaches an important principle: casting blame early on can make your organization appear defensive and insincere. Regardless of where the vulnerability arose, customers ultimately trusted your business with their data. It’s imperative to accept responsibility, communicate how you plan to resolve the issue, and avoid shifting blame onto external parties.
This image is property of image-optimizer.cyberriskalliance.com.
Sending Legal to Do the Talking
A Case Study: Common Mistakes
Another pitfall many companies have fallen into is allowing legal counsel to craft media statements. These declarations often come across as dry, impersonal, and filled with legalese. While they may seem prudent from a legal standpoint, such responses can escalate reputational damage.
The lesson here is profound: audiences crave reassurance and empathy during a crisis. Statements filled with corporate jargon can alienate stakeholders and leave them confused. It’s crucial to strike a balance. Your communications should maintain legal integrity while expressing accountability, compassion, and a commitment to rectify the situation.
Failing to Prepare the Front Lines
A Case Study: Marriott
In 2018, Marriott disclosed that a staggering 500 million guest records had been compromised. Unfortunately, their frontline staff—employees in call centers and hotel locations—were unprepared for the influx of inquiries post-announcement. Many customers reported receiving inconsistent information, leaving them feeling more uncertain and frustrated.
When it comes to crisis communication, your customer service team plays a crucial role in how the situation is perceived. If they lack clear talking points, FAQs, or scripted responses, you risk creating another communication crisis on top of the initial cyberattack. It’s essential to ensure that all internal teams are aligned and that communication protocols are firmly established before an incident occurs.
This image is property of image-optimizer.cyberriskalliance.com.
Using Technical Jargon to Confuse or Deflect
A Case Study: SolarWinds
The 2020 SolarWinds breach highlighted another communication misstep. The scale of the attack was massive, yet details shared by some affected parties included dense technical jargon. References to “nation-state actors” added to the complexity without actually clarifying the risk for clients or the public.
In today’s fast-paced environment, complicated language can alienate your audience. Your communication should work to simplify, not complicate, the situation. Using plain language can build trust and help stakeholders understand the severity of an incident. Conversely, jargon can create an impression of obfuscation.
Making Claims You Later Have to Walk Back
A Common Pitfall
One of the most damaging and prevalent mistakes you can make during a cyber incident involves issuing definitive statements too early. Phrases like “no sensitive data was accessed” or “we’ve contained the situation” are often tossed around within the first couple of days, only to be retracted as investigations unfold.
The lesson here is clear: in the initial hours or days following an incident, you often lack complete information. Avoid making promises you can’t keep; instead, communicate your ongoing assessment of the situation. A statement such as “we are still assessing the full scope” demonstrates both honesty and a commitment to transparency, which can go a long way in maintaining trust.
This image is property of image-optimizer.cyberriskalliance.com.
The Bottom Line
No organization is immune to cyber threats. However, every organization has the authority to choose how it communicates during such crises. Often, the worst responses stem from fear—fear of legal repercussions, reputational damage, or scrutiny from the public. On the other hand, the most effective responses are anchored in values like responsibility, honesty, and respect for those affected by the incident.
Preparing Your Organization
When it comes to crisis communication, planning is key. If your crisis strategy hinges solely on IT response while neglecting the communication aspect, you may find yourself unprepared when adversity strikes.
-
Develop a Crisis Communication Plan: Your crisis communication strategy should include prepared statements and a designated communication team. Ensure it encompasses customer service, PR, legal, and IT departments to create a unified front.
-
Train Staff Regularly: Regular training sessions for all employees, especially customer-facing staff, should be held to ensure readiness when incidents occur. Clear guidance can mitigate confusion and empower employees to handle inquiries with confidence.
-
Create Clear Messaging: Establish standard messaging templates that prioritize transparency and clarity. These can act as a guide for communications in the event of an incident and can be modified as new information becomes available.
-
Establish Protocols for Updates: Create a process for updating information as it develops. Clear communication about what is known, what is being done, and how it affects stakeholders can help maintain trust during a crisis.
Conclusion
Handling a cyberattack effectively requires more than just an IT response; it demands clear communication that acknowledges the impact on affected individuals. Every incident is an opportunity to learn and improve communication strategies.
Navigating a crisis does not have to lead to reputational damage; with an effective crisis communication strategy in place, your organization can emerge wiser and more resilient. Each misstep in crisis communications teaches valuable lessons that can prepare you for future challenges, reassuring your stakeholders that you are committed to accountability and transparency as you work toward resolution.
In a world where cyber threats are inevitable, being equipped to handle the aftermath through effective communication can be your greatest asset. Strive for transparency, maintain trust, and remember to listen to the concerns of those impacted. By doing so, you not only mitigate the damage and create a roadmap for recovery, but you also strengthen your organization’s reputation in a time of crisis.
This image is property of image-optimizer.cyberriskalliance.com.